Compare HTC Desire 816 vs Xolo Black 3GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 816 is the same as Xolo Black 3GB
  • Internal Storage of Xolo Black 3GB's is 50.0% more than HTC Desire 816
  • Xolo Black 3GB has 3GB RAM, whereas HTC Desire 816 has 1.5GB RAM
 
HTC Desire 816
Xolo Black 3GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
61 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR +2MP Rear Camera, HDR, Red eye, Geo tagging removal, Panorama capture, Zero Shutter Lag, Supports Ubifocus, ChromaFlash Optizoom   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 8 155.5 x 76.6 x 73   
Weight
165 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Orange Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB 11.08GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Qualcomm Quick Charge 1.0   

HTC Desire 816 vs Xolo Black 3GB Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816Xolo Black 3GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Xolo Black 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality and design
  • Decent rear and front cameras, front camera has an LED Flash as well
  • Good multitasking experience, thanks to 3GB RAM
  • Sharp display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Sluggish User Interface at times
  • Not a great device for gaming or performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Hybrid SIM slot, limits storage to 16GB if the device is used with two SIMs

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816 with Xolo Black 3GB. When you see HTC Desire 816 Vs Xolo Black 3GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816 stands against Xolo Black 3GB and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page