Compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs Gionee A1

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is the same as Gionee A1
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Gionee A1 is 75.0% more
  • Gionee A1 has 4GB RAM, whereas HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim has 1GB RAM
 
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim
Gionee A1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
51 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
86 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 400.53 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 4GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- Amigo 4.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 7.9 154.5 x 76.5 x 8.3   
Weight
158 grams 182 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black, Gold, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 2 Year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 4010mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs Gionee A1 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual SimGionee A1  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh4010mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP16MP  

Gionee A1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Comes with the latest Android 7.0 Nougat
  • Decent performance, good to handle day-to-day tasks
  • Splendid battery life
The Bad
  • Bloated UI
  • Heats up on extensive usage
  • Cameras could have been better

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim with Gionee A1. When you see HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim Vs Gionee A1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim stands against Gionee A1 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is currently Rs. 12,500. The lowest price for Gionee A1 is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page