Compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs LeEco Le 2

Feature Comparison

  • Both HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim and LeEco Le 2 have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of LeEco Le 2's is 50.0% more than HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim
  • The 3GB RAM on the LeEco Le 2 is 66.0% more
 
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim
LeEco Le 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
92 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- EUI 5.5 UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 7.9 151.1 × 74.2 × 7.7   
Weight
158 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm USB Type C   
Color
White Gold, Rose Gold, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.29GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Quick Charge 2.0   

HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs LeEco Le 2 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual SimLeEco Le 2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

LeEco Le 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good performer, thanks to the processor and 3GB RAM
  • Very sharp display with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Rear camera supports OIS and 4K video recording
  • USB Type-C port that supports Quick Charge 2.0
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint scanner
The Bad
  • Heavily skinned User Interface which may slow the overall UI
  • Some users are complaining of a creaking display
  • Very minor pink tinge to pictures taken by the camera in moderately lit conditions
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack, users need to carry an adapter to use headphones.

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim with LeEco Le 2. When you see HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim Vs LeEco Le 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim stands against LeEco Le 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is currently Rs. 11,000. The lowest price for LeEco Le 2 is Rs. 11,380. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page