Compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is the same as Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is the same as Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
  • The RAM on Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) is 66.0% more
 
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim
We Love
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
54 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Exynos 7580   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 7.9 151.5 x 74.1 x 7.3   
Weight
158 grams 172 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.82GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Fast Charging   

HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual SimSamsung Galaxy A7 (2016)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality rivaling that of the Galaxy S6
  • Vibrant display with sharp colours
  • Solid battery life that easily lasts a whole day
  • Samsung bundles the phone with very little bloatware
The Bad
  • The UI overall can be sluggish with lags
  • Not a device meant for gaming as it tends to drop quite a lot of frames
  • Camera app takes a while to launch which leads to missing shots
  • Low light shots from the camera have a lot of noise

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim with Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). When you see HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim Vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim stands against Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is currently Rs. 10,500. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) is Rs. 18,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page