Compare HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim vs BlackBerry Classic Q20

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 36.0% more
  • BlackBerry Classic Q20 has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim has 8GB Internal Storage
  • The 2GB RAM on the BlackBerry Classic Q20 is 50.0% more
 
HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim
BlackBerry Classic Q20
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
68 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 3.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 720 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 290.9 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Qualcomm Snapdragon 836   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 225   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android BlackBerry   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- BlackBerry OS 10.3   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.74 x 7.99 131 x 72.4 x 10.2   
Weight
158 grams 177 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Blue, Orange Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.3GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2515mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim vs BlackBerry Classic Q20 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Dual SimBlackBerry Classic Q20  
Screen Size 5.5 inch3.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2515mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

BlackBerry Classic Q20 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The keyboard is classic BlackBerry and is excellent for typing
  • Excellent call reception
  • BlackBerry Assistant is useful
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Camera is bad in low light conditions
  • Touchscreen is cramped which makes hitting a touch point challenging
  • Trackpad is not all that useful
  • No Google Play Services so plenty of Android apps do not function

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front Stereo Speakers
  • Excellent Camera
  • Dual SIM
The Bad
  • Not that sharp display at just 267PPI
  • Below average processor and just 1GB of RAM
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Way outdated Android version
  • Lacks 4G support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim with BlackBerry Classic Q20. When you see HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Vs BlackBerry Classic Q20 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim stands against BlackBerry Classic Q20 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim is currently Rs. 16,900. The lowest price for BlackBerry Classic Q20 is Rs. 18,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page