Compare HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim vs LG G3 Stylus (D690)

Feature Comparison

  • Both HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim and LG G3 Stylus (D690) have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim is the same as LG G3 Stylus (D690)
  • Both HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim and LG G3 Stylus (D690) have same RAM
 
HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim
LG G3 Stylus (D690)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
90 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 200.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 1.3MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor BSI Sensor, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.74 x 7.99 149.3 x 75.9 x 10.2   
Weight
158 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Blue, Orange Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.3GB 3.86GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim vs LG G3 Stylus (D690) Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Dual SimLG G3 Stylus (D690)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP1.3MP  

LG G3 Stylus (D690) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The phone has a solid design that is tried and tested on the LG G3
  • Comes with a stylus out of the box to help you draw or note on the screen
  • The phone comes with a removable back panel and a user replaceable battery
The Bad
  • Stylus does not have the most accurate tip and is not very good, in general
  • No apps specifically optimized for use of stylus, unlike the Note series which has plenty of them
  • Disappointing display overall

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front Stereo Speakers
  • Excellent Camera
  • Dual SIM
The Bad
  • Not that sharp display at just 267PPI
  • Below average processor and just 1GB of RAM
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Way outdated Android version
  • Lacks 4G support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim with LG G3 Stylus (D690). When you see HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Vs LG G3 Stylus (D690) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim stands against LG G3 Stylus (D690) and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim is currently Rs. 16,900. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page