Compare HTC Desire 820 vs Huawei Honor 6 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 820 is the same as Huawei Honor 6 Plus
  • The Huawei Honor 6 Plus's got 32GB Internal Storage, while HTC Desire 820's Internal Storage is 16GB
  • Huawei Honor 6 Plus has 33.0% more RAM
 
HTC Desire 820
Huawei Honor 6 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
72 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm HiSilicon Kirin   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 HiSilicon Kirin 925   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-628 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR +13MP Rear Camera, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geo tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.7 x 78.7 x 7.7 150.46 x 75.68 x 7.5   
Weight
155 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Red, Gray Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 820 vs Huawei Honor 6 Plus Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 820Huawei Honor 6 Plus  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

HTC Desire 820 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Dual tone design is unique and eye-catching
  • The front facing stereo speakers are excellent
  • The Sense UI is sleek and light on memory
  • HTC Zoe is a nice little edition for you to share quick video clips
The Bad
  • The back of the phone can pick up a ton of scratches
  • Lacks NFC connectivity
  • Video recording in 1080P is not a great experience
  • Battery life is erratic

Huawei Honor 6 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dual rear camera performs well in low-light
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • Support single SIM only
  • Lacks OIS
  • Disappointing audio output

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 820 with Huawei Honor 6 Plus. When you see HTC Desire 820 Vs Huawei Honor 6 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 820 stands against Huawei Honor 6 Plus and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page