Compare HTC Desire 820s vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra

Feature Comparison

  • Sony Xperia XA Ultra has 8.0% more Screen Size
  • Both HTC Desire 820s and Sony Xperia XA Ultra have same Internal Storage
  • The Sony Xperia XA Ultra's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
HTC Desire 820s
Sony Xperia XA Ultra
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
74 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 367 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6752 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T760 MP2 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 21.5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Auto Focus, BSI Sensor, Accelerometer Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor 1/2.4" Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.70 x 78.74 x 7.74 164.2 x 79.4 x 8.4   
Weight
155 grams 190 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, White-Orange, Milky Gray White, Graphite Black, Lime Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.13GB 10.07GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 200GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 820s vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 820sSony Xperia XA Ultra  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP21.5MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  

HTC Desire 820s Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front facing Stereo Speakers
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version (4.4 KitKat)
  • Average display sharpness

Sony Xperia XA Ultra Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Well built premium build quality with thin bezels
  • Smooth gaming experience
  • Clean & polished UI
  • Stunning selfie camera
The Bad
  • Grossly Overpriced
  • Disappointing display with problematic colour calibration
  • Lacks 4K video recording
  • Mediocre battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 820s with Sony Xperia XA Ultra. When you see HTC Desire 820s Vs Sony Xperia XA Ultra comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 820s stands against Sony Xperia XA Ultra and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 820s is currently Rs. 16,199. The lowest price for Sony Xperia XA Ultra is Rs. 20,480. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page