Compare HTC Desire 826 vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 826 is the same as HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
  • Both HTC Desire 826 and HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of HTC Desire 826 is the same as HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
 
HTC Desire 826
HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
97 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, OIS, BSI Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
158 x 77.5 x 7.99 157.7 × 78.9 × 7.9   
Weight
183 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Birch, Blue Lagoon White, Dark Grey   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB 9.14GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 826 vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 826HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP4MP  

HTC Desire 826 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid display at 401PPI
  • Stereo speakers with BoomSOund technology
  • Smooth user interface
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • Heats up while performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Does not support 4G LTE

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 826 with HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim. When you see HTC Desire 826 Vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 826 stands against HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 826 is currently Rs. 12,750. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is Rs. 9,700. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page