Compare HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim vs Oppo R7 Lite

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim's is 9.0% more than Oppo R7 Lite
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is the same as Oppo R7 Lite
  • RAM of HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is the same as Oppo R7 Lite
 
HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
Oppo R7 Lite
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
99 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, OIS, BSI Sensor -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
157.7 × 78.9 × 7.9 143 x 71 x 6.3   
Weight
150 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Dark Grey Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.14GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2320mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim vs Oppo R7 Lite Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 828 Dual SimOppo R7 Lite  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2320mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP8MP  

Oppo R7 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solidly built with no creeks and loose components
  • Metallic body gives the phone a premium feel
  • Excellent battery life
  • Feature full and interesting camera app with lots of customization possible
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • The camera really struggles in low light shots
  • Surprisingly there is no NFC or FM Radio
  • Sound output, both from headphones and speakers is below satisfactory

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim with Oppo R7 Lite. When you see HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Vs Oppo R7 Lite comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim stands against Oppo R7 Lite and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is currently Rs. 9,700. The lowest price for Oppo R7 Lite is Rs. 11,100. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page