Compare HTC Desire C A320E vs LG Q6

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of LG Q6's is 36.0% more than HTC Desire C A320E
  • LG Q6 has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas HTC Desire C A320E has 4GB Internal Storage
  • LG Q6's 3GB RAM is more than HTC Desire C A320E's 512MB RAM
 
HTC Desire C A320E
We Love
LG Q6
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
11 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 2160 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
164.8 PPI 439 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- Yes   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
600MHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 435   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 200 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Digital image stabilization, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Touch focus, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, Face Recognition   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
107.2 x 60.6 x 11.95 142.5 x 69.3 x 8.1   
Weight
98 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Astro Black, Ice Platinum, Terra Gold   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 1.54W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.384W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 2TB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1230mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire C A320E vs LG Q6 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire C A320ELG Q6  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1230mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

LG Q6 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The best looking budget smartphone
  • Smaller form factor
  • Good value for money
The Bad
  • Lacks fingerprint scanner
  • Average performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire C A320E with LG Q6. When you see HTC Desire C A320E Vs LG Q6 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire C A320E stands against LG Q6 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for LG Q6 is Rs. 12,990. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page