Compare HTC Desire C A320E vs Vivo V5

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo V5's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than HTC Desire C A320E's 3.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Vivo V5's got 32GB Internal Storage, while HTC Desire C A320E's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The 4GB RAM on the Vivo V5 is 87.0% more
 
HTC Desire C A320E
Vivo V5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
8 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
43 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
164.8 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
600MHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Single-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 200 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
- 20MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging Face Beauty, Panorama, HDR, Night, Ultra HD, PPT, Motion Track, Professional, Slow, Fast, Voice Shutter, Touch Capture, Palm, Timer, Gender Detection, Filter, Watermark   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) Funtouch OS 2.6   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
107.2 x 60.6 x 11.95 153.8 x 75.5 x 7.55   
Weight
98 grams 154 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Crown Gold, Rose Gold, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.77W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.22W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1230mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC Desire C A320E vs Vivo V5 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire C A320EVivo V5  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1230mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 20MP  

Vivo V5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 20MP front camera is suitable for selfie lovers
  • Slim & light build profile
  • Can be bought offline too
  • Snappy fingerprint scanner
The Bad
  • Poor display resolution
  • Lacks USB Type-C support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire C A320E with Vivo V5. When you see HTC Desire C A320E Vs Vivo V5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire C A320E stands against Vivo V5 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Vivo V5 is Rs. 13,975. The prices for both these products were updated November 23, 2017.
Report an error on this page