Compare HTC Desire Eye vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire Eye is the same as HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire Eye is the same as HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
  • RAM of HTC Desire Eye is the same as HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
 
HTC Desire Eye
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
92 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 569 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.7 x 73.8 x 8.5 150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61   
Weight
154 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
white, Blue Silver, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.53GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2400mAh 2840mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire Eye vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) Specs

Specs
HTC Desire EyeHTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2400mAh2840mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP2MP  

HTC Desire Eye Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning looking smartphone with a very solid build quality
  • The phone comes with a waterproof rating
  • Front facing camera has a flash, which is a first
  • Beautiful screen with true colour reproduction
The Bad
  • Plenty of noise despite a really good front facing camera when taking selfies
  • Battery life is erratic and may not last all day
  • BoomSound speakers are not as loud as on older HTC devices like the HTC M8
  • The physical buttons lack a good feedback as they are flushed with the body

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire Eye with HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB). When you see HTC Desire Eye Vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire Eye stands against HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire Eye is currently Rs. 15,990. The lowest price for HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) is Rs. 16,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page