Compare HTC Desire Eye vs Vivo V1 Max

Feature Comparison

  • Vivo V1 Max has 5.5 inch Screen Size and HTC Desire Eye has 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire Eye is the same as Vivo V1 Max
  • RAM of HTC Desire Eye is the same as Vivo V1 Max
 
HTC Desire Eye
Vivo V1 Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
76 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Continuos Shooting, Exposure compensation, Face detection, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Self-timer, Touch to focus, White balance prese   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (5.0)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.7 x 73.8 x 8.5 -   
Weight
154 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
white, Blue White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.53GB 9.62GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2400mAh 2720mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire Eye vs Vivo V1 Max Specs

Specs
HTC Desire EyeVivo V1 Max  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2400mAh2720mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

Vivo V1 Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD display
  • 4G LTE support
  • Slim design
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version

HTC Desire Eye Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning looking smartphone with a very solid build quality
  • The phone comes with a waterproof rating
  • Front facing camera has a flash, which is a first
  • Beautiful screen with true colour reproduction
The Bad
  • Plenty of noise despite a really good front facing camera when taking selfies
  • Battery life is erratic and may not last all day
  • BoomSound speakers are not as loud as on older HTC devices like the HTC M8
  • The physical buttons lack a good feedback as they are flushed with the body

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire Eye with Vivo V1 Max. When you see HTC Desire Eye Vs Vivo V1 Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire Eye stands against Vivo V1 Max and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire Eye is currently Rs. 15,990. The lowest price for Vivo V1 Max is Rs. 11,052. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page