Compare HTC Desire Eye vs Vivo Y15

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire Eye's Screen Size measures in at 5.2 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 13.0% more
  • HTC Desire Eye's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Vivo Y15's 4GB Internal Storage
  • HTC Desire Eye's RAM is 75.0% more
 
HTC Desire Eye
Vivo Y15
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
38 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
54 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 217.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 512MB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.2)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.7 x 73.8 x 8.5 130.4 x 65.85 x 8.9   
Weight
154 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
white, Blue White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.53GB 2.3GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2400mAh 1900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire Eye vs Vivo Y15 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire EyeVivo Y15  
Screen Size 5.2 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 2GB512MB  
Battery Capacity 2400mAh1900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP2MP  

Vivo Y15 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Expandable memory up to 128MB thanks to a Micro SD slot
  • 3G enabled
  • Removable back and battery pack
The Bad
  • Sluggish performance due to just 512MB of RAM
  • Pixelated display attributed to a pixel density of 217 PPI
  • Only 4GB of internal memory

HTC Desire Eye Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning looking smartphone with a very solid build quality
  • The phone comes with a waterproof rating
  • Front facing camera has a flash, which is a first
  • Beautiful screen with true colour reproduction
The Bad
  • Plenty of noise despite a really good front facing camera when taking selfies
  • Battery life is erratic and may not last all day
  • BoomSound speakers are not as loud as on older HTC devices like the HTC M8
  • The physical buttons lack a good feedback as they are flushed with the body

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire Eye with Vivo Y15. When you see HTC Desire Eye Vs Vivo Y15 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire Eye stands against Vivo Y15 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire Eye is currently Rs. 18,000. The prices for both these products were updated September 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page