Compare HTC Desire Eye vs Xiaomi Mi A1

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Mi A1 has 5.0% more Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Xiaomi Mi A1 is 75.0% more
  • The 4GB RAM on the Xiaomi Mi A1 is 50.0% more
 
HTC Desire Eye
We Love
Xiaomi Mi A1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
423.6 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR + 12 MP Dual Rear Camera, Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Smart Beautify, Portrait Mode,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 Android O   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Water Resistance, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.7 x 73.8 x 8.5 155.4 x 75.8 x 7.3   
Weight
154 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
white, Blue Black, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.53GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2400mAh 3080mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire Eye vs Xiaomi Mi A1 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire EyeXiaomi Mi A1  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP12MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2400mAh3080mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

HTC Desire Eye Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stunning looking smartphone with a very solid build quality
  • The phone comes with a waterproof rating
  • Front facing camera has a flash, which is a first
  • Beautiful screen with true colour reproduction
The Bad
  • Plenty of noise despite a really good front facing camera when taking selfies
  • Battery life is erratic and may not last all day
  • BoomSound speakers are not as loud as on older HTC devices like the HTC M8
  • The physical buttons lack a good feedback as they are flushed with the body

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire Eye with Xiaomi Mi A1. When you see HTC Desire Eye Vs Xiaomi Mi A1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire Eye stands against Xiaomi Mi A1 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire Eye is currently Rs. 15,990. The lowest price for Xiaomi Mi A1 is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 15, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page