Compare HTC Explorer A310E vs Motorola Moto X Play 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Motorola Moto X Play 32GB's is 41.0% more than HTC Explorer A310E
  • Motorola Moto X Play 32GB has 99.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Motorola Moto X Play 32GB's is 75.0% more than HTC Explorer A310E
 
HTC Explorer A310E
Motorola Moto X Play 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
44 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
180.3 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
600MHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
- Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 200 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Face Detection f/2.0, Phase Detection Autofocus, Dual-LED (Dual Tone) Flash, Check Quality Features 1/2.4" Sensor Size, 1.1 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
- Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 2.3 Gingerbread Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (2.3) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
102.8 x 57.2 x 12.9 148.0 x 75.0 x 8.9   
Weight
108 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, White   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
90MB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.82GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1230mAh 3630mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

HTC Explorer A310E vs Motorola Moto X Play 32GB Specs

Specs
HTC Explorer A310EMotorola Moto X Play 32GB  
Screen Size 3.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP21MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1230mAh3630mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Motorola Moto X Play 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Close to stock Android ensures timely updates
  • Very good battery life
  • The curve on the back ensures that phone sits very nicely in the hand
  • Bright and punchy display with excellent color reproduction
  • Dual SIM card slot and a separate slot for MicroSD
The Bad
  • Camera performance can be underwhelming especially in low light
  • No water or dust resistance
  • The phone can get a little warm during day to day usage
  • The speaker grille flushed almost with the body means dust removal can be a bit of pain

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Explorer A310E with Motorola Moto X Play 32GB. When you see HTC Explorer A310E Vs Motorola Moto X Play 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Explorer A310E stands against Motorola Moto X Play 32GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto X Play 32GB is Rs. 18,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page