Compare HTC One A9 3GB/32GB vs Nubia M2

Feature Comparison

  • The Nubia M2's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while HTC One A9 3GB/32GB's Screen Size is 5 inch
  • Nubia M2 has 64GB Internal Storage, whereas HTC One A9 3GB/32GB has 32GB Internal Storage
  • Nubia M2's 4GB RAM is more than HTC One A9 3GB/32GB's 3GB RAM
 
HTC One A9 3GB/32GB
Nubia M2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
94 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
85 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR +13MP Rear Camera   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
145.8 x 70.8 x 7.3 154.5 x 75.9 x 7   
Weight
143 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Carbon Grey, Silver Black Gold, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 200GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2150mAh 3630mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC One A9 3GB/32GB vs Nubia M2 Specs

Specs
HTC One A9 3GB/32GBNubia M2  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2150mAh3630mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP16MP  

HTC One A9 3GB/32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gorgeous albeit a bit unoriginal design
  • Fast fingerprint scanner
  • Phone feels good in the hand and can be used single handedly
  • Clean interface without too much bloatware
  • UX is smooth across the device
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • The phone does not come with a Quick Charger out of the box
  • No BoomSound speakers
  • Camera still falls short when compared to the competition

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One A9 3GB/32GB with Nubia M2. When you see HTC One A9 3GB/32GB Vs Nubia M2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One A9 3GB/32GB stands against Nubia M2 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One A9 3GB/32GB is currently Rs. 22,180. The lowest price for Nubia M2 is Rs. 17,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page