Compare HTC One E9+ vs Nubia Z11

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC One E9+ is the same as Nubia Z11
  • The Nubia Z11 has 64GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • Nubia Z11 has 6GB RAM, whereas HTC One E9+ has 3GB RAM
 
HTC One E9+
Nubia Z11
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
88 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
81 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
534 PPI 403 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 2.1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 6GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6200 Adreno 530   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama 1/2.8" sensor size, 1.12 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Sense UI -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54 151.8 x 72.3 x 7.5   
Weight
149 grams 162 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Meteor Grey, Rose Gold Black, Gray   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
22GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC One E9+ vs Nubia Z11 Specs

Specs
HTC One E9+Nubia Z11  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20MP16MP  
RAM 3GB6GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP8MP  

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Nubia Z11 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking phone with solid build quality
  • Gaming and overall performance is good
  • Fingerprint scanner is accurate
  • Awesome viewing angles and brightness
  • Bezel-less display looks brilliant
The Bad
  • It can be little slippery at times
  • Sound output is pretty quiet
  • Full HD display; QHD would have been better

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One E9+ with Nubia Z11. When you see HTC One E9+ Vs Nubia Z11 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One E9+ stands against Nubia Z11 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Nubia Z11 is Rs. 24,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page