Compare HTC One M8 32GB vs Sony Xperia E3 Dual

Feature Comparison

  • HTC One M8 32GB's got 10.0% more Screen Size
  • The HTC One M8 32GB has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 87.0% more
  • HTC One M8 32GB has 50.0% more RAM
 
HTC One M8 32GB
Sony Xperia E3 Dual
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
45 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
76 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 217.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
4MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 0.3MP   
Camera Details
4MP + 4MP Dual Rear Camera, 1/3'' Sensor Size, 2µm Pixel Size, Automatic Simultaneous Video and Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face and Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
146.4 x 70.6 x 9.4 137.1 x 69.4 x 8.5   
Weight
160 grams 144 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gunmetal Grey, Red, Gold Black, White   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 1.7GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2330mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC One M8 32GB vs Sony Xperia E3 Dual Specs

Specs
HTC One M8 32GBSony Xperia E3 Dual  
Screen Size 5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 4MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2330mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP0.3MP  

HTC One M8 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality and a solid feel to the device
  • The curvature to the back makes the phone sit very well in the hands
  • The stereo speakers on the front called BoomSound, give an amazing audio experience
  • Gorgeous display with good colour accuracy
  • HTC Zoe is a lot of fun for producing short shareable clips
The Bad
  • The camera lens on the back of the device is prone to picking lots of scratches
  • Dual lens setup is more gimmicky as it produces very artificial results
  • Camera is poor in bright light condition
  • Gripping the phone can be a problem
  • The shots from rear camera lacks details since its just 4MP

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One M8 32GB with Sony Xperia E3 Dual. When you see HTC One M8 32GB Vs Sony Xperia E3 Dual comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One M8 32GB stands against Sony Xperia E3 Dual and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page