Compare HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy On Nxt's Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • The Internal Storage on Samsung Galaxy On Nxt is 50.0% more
  • Samsung Galaxy On Nxt has 3GB RAM and HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) has 2GB RAM
 
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
98 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
93 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
569 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 Exynos 7870   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6200 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Interval Shot, Night, Panorama, Pro, Selfie, Sports, Sound and Shot, Wide Selfie   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61 151.7 x 75 x 8   
Weight
168 grams 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Gunmetal Gray Black, Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 24.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2840mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt Specs

Specs
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)Samsung Galaxy On Nxt  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2840mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at 401PPI with Gorilla Glass prortection
  • Good battery life that should last through a day for most
  • Solid metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent day-to-day performance
The Bad
  • Rear camera lacks 4K video recording
  • Performance of the rear camera in low light conditions could be better
  • Lacks fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) with Samsung Galaxy On Nxt. When you see HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) Vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) stands against Samsung Galaxy On Nxt and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) is currently Rs. 14,500. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On Nxt is Rs. 15,749. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page