Compare HTC One M9+ vs BlackBerry Optiemus

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on BlackBerry Optiemus is 5.0% more
  • Internal Storage of HTC One M9+ is the same as BlackBerry Optiemus
  • BlackBerry Optiemus has 25.0% more RAM
 
HTC One M9+
BlackBerry Optiemus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
95 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
79 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
564.8 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 2.15GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6200 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20MP 21MP   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Auto-Focus, Phase Detect Auto Focus (PDAF), Fast Focus Lock, HDR, 6-element f2.0 Lens, Dual Tone LED Flash - Enhanced Photo Color Balance, 4x Digital Zoom, Continuous and Touch to Focus, Face Detection, Video Image Stabilization, Full Manual Controls, Panorama, Burst, Live Filters, Multi-Frame Low Light Enhancement, 4K HD Video Recording at 30 fps, 720p HD Video Recording at 120 fps   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61 -   
Weight
168 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Gold Titanium Silver   
Build Material
Metal Unibody -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
21GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 2TB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2840mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC One M9+ vs BlackBerry Optiemus Specs

Specs
HTC One M9+BlackBerry Optiemus  
Screen Size 5.2 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20MP21MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2840mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP8MP  

HTC One M9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 565PPI
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Quick unlock with fingerprint sensor
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One M9+ with BlackBerry Optiemus. When you see HTC One M9+ Vs BlackBerry Optiemus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One M9+ stands against BlackBerry Optiemus and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One M9+ is currently Rs. 32,020. The lowest price for BlackBerry Optiemus is Rs. 39,200. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page