Compare HTC One M9 vs HTC Desire 825

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 825's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than HTC One M9's 5 inch Screen Size
  • The HTC One M9's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • The HTC One M9 has 3GB RAM, which is 33.0% more
 
HTC One M9
HTC Desire 825
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
52 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
88 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 430 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Sapphire Cover Lens, Automatic Simultaneous Video and Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Sense 7 UI   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
144.6 x 69.7 x 9.61 156.9 x 76.9 x 7.4   
Weight
157 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Stratus White, Graphite Gray   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
21GB 10.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
200GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2840mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

HTC One M9 vs HTC Desire 825 Specs

Specs
HTC One M9HTC Desire 825  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2840mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP5MP  

HTC One M9 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • All Metal Unibody design makes the phone look and feel premium
  • Stereo speakers with BoomSound technology
  • MicroSD card slot for storage expansion
  • Brilliant display with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
The Bad
  • Not the best camera performance
  • Average battery life

HTC Desire 825 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique paint splashed body paint
  • BoomSound on the phone gives it an amazing experience when listening to audio
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • Sluggish performance when doing very heavy tasks

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One M9 with HTC Desire 825. When you see HTC One M9 Vs HTC Desire 825 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One M9 stands against HTC Desire 825 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One M9 is currently Rs. 14,990. The lowest price for HTC Desire 825 is Rs. 11,899. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page