Compare HTC One M9 vs Xiaomi Mi Max Prime

Feature Comparison

  • The Xiaomi Mi Max Prime's Screen Size measures in at 6.44 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 22.0% more
  • Xiaomi Mi Max Prime's Internal Storage is 75.0% more
  • The Xiaomi Mi Max Prime has 4GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
HTC One M9
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
92 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
88 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 6.44 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 342 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 430 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
20MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Sapphire Cover Lens, Automatic Simultaneous Video and Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- MiUi 7   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
144.6 x 69.7 x 9.61 173.1 x 88.3 x 7.5   
Weight
157 grams 203 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Gray, Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 128GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
21GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
200GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2840mAh 4850mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC One M9 vs Xiaomi Mi Max Prime Specs

Specs
HTC One M9Xiaomi Mi Max Prime  
Screen Size 5 inch6.44 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 20MP16MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2840mAh4850mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP5MP  

HTC One M9 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • All Metal Unibody design makes the phone look and feel premium
  • Stereo speakers with BoomSound technology
  • MicroSD card slot for storage expansion
  • Brilliant display with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
The Bad
  • Not the best camera performance
  • Average battery life

Xiaomi Mi Max Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Fast fingerprint scanner
  • Fantastic battery life
  • Acceptable camera quality
The Bad
  • Reported issues with 4K video recording
  • Display visibility reportedly not great outdoors

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One M9 with Xiaomi Mi Max Prime. When you see HTC One M9 Vs Xiaomi Mi Max Prime comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One M9 stands against Xiaomi Mi Max Prime and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One M9 is currently Rs. 14,990. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page