Compare HTC One Max vs Oppo Find 7

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.9 inch Screen Size on the HTC One Max is 6.0% more
  • The Oppo Find 7's got 32GB Internal Storage, while HTC One Max's Internal Storage is 16GB
  • Oppo Find 7 has 3GB RAM and HTC One Max has 2GB RAM
 
HTC One Max
Oppo Find 7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
68 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
88 Value For Money Score
88 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.9 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
373.4 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
4MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
1/3'' Sensor Size, 2µm Pixel Size, Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Face & Smile Detection 1/3" sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.3) ColorOS UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
164.5 x 82.5 x 10.29 152.6 x 75 x 9.2   
Weight
217 grams 173 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3300mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, VOOC Flash Charge   

HTC One Max vs Oppo Find 7 Specs

Specs
HTC One MaxOppo Find 7  
Screen Size 5.9 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 4MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3300mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP5MP  

HTC One Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Exceptional screen
  • BoomSound speakers make media consumption on the device a pure joy
  • Thanks to a generous metal construction the phone feel premium
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • The fingerprint scanner on the back often fails to recognize the finger
  • The phone is too large and heavy for one handed usage or to be carried in tight jeans
  • No OIS on the camera
  • Looks like an expanded HTC One M7 and hence lacks a personality

Oppo Find 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp Quad HD display with 534PPI
  • Decent performance with Snapdragon 801 combined with 3GB RAM
  • Good battery life
  • Stereo speakers for good multimedia experience
The Bad
  • Runs on way old Android version 4.3 Jelly Bean
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One Max with Oppo Find 7. When you see HTC One Max Vs Oppo Find 7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One Max stands against Oppo Find 7 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page