Compare HTC One X vs Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC One X's is 4.0% more than Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB
  • HTC One X has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of HTC One X is the same as Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB
 
HTC One X
Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
70 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
-- Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 326 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
NVIDIA Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
NVIDIA Tegra 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
ULP GeForce Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 1MP   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face & Smile Detection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.1   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
134.4 x 69.9 x 8.9 129.9 x 65.9 x 11.6   
Weight
130 grams 143 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black -   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
No -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2070mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC One X vs Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB Specs

Specs
HTC One XMotorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB  
Screen Size 4.7 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2070mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP1MP  

Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Near stock Android experience with promise for quick updates in future
  • Compact size, which makes the phone usable with one hand
  • Overall snappy performance
  • Excellent battery life
The Bad
  • The camera performance leaves a lot to be desired
  • Speakers on the phone are not the loudest
  • Lacks LTE
  • No expandable storage

HTC One X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gorgeous display with good sharp colours
  • Solid build thanks to the unibody polycarbonate construction
  • Camera UI is ahead of its time and really good
  • Very capable processor allows for a snappy performance
  • Exceptional speakers
The Bad
  • The hardware buttons lack good feedback
  • Battery life can be really hit and miss
  • The phone can get a little hot if pushed hard while playing games
  • No Micro SD card slot
  • Videos from the rear camera come out grainy

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One X with Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB. When you see HTC One X Vs Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One X stands against Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G (1st Gen) 8GB is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated February 27, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page