Compare HTC One X9 vs HTC Desire 825

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC One X9 is the same as HTC Desire 825
  • HTC One X9's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • HTC One X9's got 33.0% more RAM
 
HTC One X9
HTC Desire 825
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
63 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
81 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.2GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
PowerVR G6200 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Sense 7 UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
153.9 x 75.9 x 8 156.9 x 76.9 x 7.4   
Weight
170 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Carbon Grey, Topaz Gold Stratus White, Graphite Gray   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
23.3GB 10.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No   
Fast Charging
Yes, Fast Charging Yes   

HTC One X9 vs HTC Desire 825 Specs

Specs
HTC One X9HTC Desire 825  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

HTC One X9 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Metallic build makes the phone feel really premium
  • BoomSound speakers makes media consumption on the device a great experience
  • Camera has OIS
  • Dedicated slot for Micro SD expansion
The Bad
  • Helio X10 struggles when playing very graphic intensive games
  • Lacks a fingerprint scanner
  • The phone feels a tad bit heavy in the hand
  • The overall design feels like a mish-mash rather than a clean thought out one

HTC Desire 825 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique paint splashed body paint
  • BoomSound on the phone gives it an amazing experience when listening to audio
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • Sluggish performance when doing very heavy tasks

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One X9 with HTC Desire 825. When you see HTC One X9 Vs HTC Desire 825 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One X9 stands against HTC Desire 825 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One X9 is currently Rs. 14,779. The lowest price for HTC Desire 825 is Rs. 11,899. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page