Compare Huawei Honor 6 Plus vs Xolo Era 4K

Feature Comparison

  • The Huawei Honor 6 Plus has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 9.0% more
  • Huawei Honor 6 Plus has 32GB Internal Storage and Xolo Era 4K has 8GB Internal Storage
  • Huawei Honor 6 Plus's 3GB RAM is more than Xolo Era 4K's 2GB RAM
 
Huawei Honor 6 Plus
Xolo Era 4K
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
70 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
81 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
HiSilicon Kirin MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1GHz   
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 925 MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-628 MP4 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
+13MP Rear Camera, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geo tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.46 x 75.68 x 7.5 143 x 71.8 × 9.2   
Weight
165 grams 157 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Dark Blue, White   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 5.31GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3600mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Huawei Honor 6 Plus vs Xolo Era 4K Specs

Specs
Huawei Honor 6 PlusXolo Era 4K  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3600mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Xolo Era 4K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Compact design with a good build quality and reassuring feel
  • Mostly stock Android UI
  • Air shuffle lets you use proximity sensor to change songs or radio channels
The Bad
  • Comes pre-loaded with a ton of bloatware
  • Internal memory to the user is very low
  • The back panel is prone to picking up scratches
  • Highly reflective display which can be a little difficult to read in direct sunlight

Huawei Honor 6 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dual rear camera performs well in low-light
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • Support single SIM only
  • Lacks OIS
  • Disappointing audio output

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Huawei Honor 6 Plus with Xolo Era 4K. When you see Huawei Honor 6 Plus Vs Xolo Era 4K comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Huawei Honor 6 Plus stands against Xolo Era 4K and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page