Compare InFocus Bingo 50 vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of InFocus Bingo 50 is the same as Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
  • Internal Storage of InFocus Bingo 50 is the same as Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
  • InFocus Bingo 50 has 33.0% more RAM
 
InFocus Bingo 50
Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
98 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
76 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 Spreadtrum SC9832   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Digital zoom, Continuous shooting, Autofocus, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Touch focus, Scene mode, Self timer, Exposure compensation -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
InLife UI 2.0 Indus OS 2.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.96 x 71.45 x 10.60 143.5 x 71.6 x 8.65   
Weight
152 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Sandstone Gray Gold   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.79GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 3900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

InFocus Bingo 50 vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Specs

Specs
InFocus Bingo 50Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh3900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at a decent 294PPI
  • Good build quality and design
  • 5 inch form factor makes it comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • Inclusion of 12 local languages is a huge plus for Indian users
  • Decent battery life with average usage
The Bad
  • Not the best performance in the price range
  • Slow charging might frustrate some
  • Fingerprint sensor is not that great

InFocus Bingo 50 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
  • Ample 3GB of RAM
The Bad
  • Build and design leave more to be desired
  • Average camera

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus Bingo 50 with Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465. When you see InFocus Bingo 50 Vs Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus Bingo 50 stands against Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Unite Canvas 4 Pro Q465 is Rs. 8,771. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page