Compare InFocus Bingo 50 vs Motorola Moto E3 Power

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of InFocus Bingo 50 is the same as Motorola Moto E3 Power
  • Internal Storage of InFocus Bingo 50 is the same as Motorola Moto E3 Power
  • InFocus Bingo 50 has 3GB RAM and Motorola Moto E3 Power has 2GB RAM
 
InFocus Bingo 50
We Love
Motorola Moto E3 Power
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6735P   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Digital zoom, Continuous shooting, Autofocus, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Touch focus, Scene mode, Self timer, Exposure compensation Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geo-tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touchfocus, Face detection, White balance setting, Scene mode, Self-timer, Exposure compensation, ISO settings   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
InLife UI 2.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
150.96 x 71.45 x 10.60 143.8 x 71.6 x 9.55   
Weight
152 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Sandstone Gray Black, White   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.96GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 3500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

InFocus Bingo 50 vs Motorola Moto E3 Power Specs

Specs
InFocus Bingo 50Motorola Moto E3 Power  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh3500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

InFocus Bingo 50 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
  • Ample 3GB of RAM
The Bad
  • Build and design leave more to be desired
  • Average camera

Motorola Moto E3 Power Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent battery life with the 3500mAh unit
  • Sharp display with HD resolution
  • Clean near stock Android Marshmallow out of the box
  • 4G LTE support with VoLTE
The Bad
  • Viewing angles and color reproduction of the display is not the best
  • Average overall performance of the device
  • Mediocre results from either cameras

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus Bingo 50 with Motorola Moto E3 Power. When you see InFocus Bingo 50 Vs Motorola Moto E3 Power comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus Bingo 50 stands against Motorola Moto E3 Power and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page