Compare InFocus Bingo 50 vs Panasonic Eluga Prim

Feature Comparison

  • Both InFocus Bingo 50 and Panasonic Eluga Prim have same Screen Size
  • Both InFocus Bingo 50 and Panasonic Eluga Prim have same Internal Storage
  • Both InFocus Bingo 50 and Panasonic Eluga Prim have same RAM
 
InFocus Bingo 50
Panasonic Eluga Prim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
80 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Digital zoom, Continuous shooting, Autofocus, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Touch focus, Scene mode, Self timer, Exposure compensation White balance settings, ISO Settings, Exposure compensation, Self-timer, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face detection, Continuous shooting   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, Triple LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
InLife UI 2.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Dust Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
150.96 x 71.45 x 10.60 -   
Weight
152 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Sandstone Gray Gold, Gun Metal Silver   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

InFocus Bingo 50 vs Panasonic Eluga Prim Specs

Specs
InFocus Bingo 50Panasonic Eluga Prim  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Panasonic Eluga Prim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Clutter-free near stock UI
  • Smudge-free back panel
  • Easy to hold & offers a decent grip
The Bad
  • Lacks a metal unibody design
  • Below average battery life
  • Sub-par camera performance

InFocus Bingo 50 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
  • Ample 3GB of RAM
The Bad
  • Build and design leave more to be desired
  • Average camera

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus Bingo 50 with Panasonic Eluga Prim. When you see InFocus Bingo 50 Vs Panasonic Eluga Prim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus Bingo 50 stands against Panasonic Eluga Prim and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Prim is Rs. 7,915. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page