Compare InFocus M680 vs Lenovo K8 Note

Feature Comparison

  • Both InFocus M680 and Lenovo K8 Note have same Screen Size
  • The Lenovo K8 Note has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • The 3GB RAM on the Lenovo K8 Note is 33.0% more
 
InFocus M680
Lenovo K8 Note
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
65 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
91 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6797D Helio x23   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Deca-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T880 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Camera Details
- +5MP Rear Camera   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156 x 76.8 x 7.25 154.5 x 75.9 x 8.5   
Weight
- 180 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Silver Venom Black, Fine Gold   
Build Material
- Metal, Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, 15W Turbo Charging   

InFocus M680 vs Lenovo K8 Note Specs

Specs
InFocus M680Lenovo K8 Note  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  

InFocus M680 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device even if the design is not the most original
  • Solid construction and feels very secure
  • Useful tweaks in the UI
  • Daylight shots from the camera are good
  • Call quality is really impressive
The Bad
  • The paint on the gold colour unit chips off with regular usage
  • Accessories seem to be made out of really cheap materials
  • Display legibility in direct sunlight is poor
  • Capacitive touch buttons have poor accuracy
  • Push the phone too hard and you will find the phone can get a fair bit warm

Lenovo K8 Note Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Commendable build quality
  • Dedicated (Customisable) music key
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
The Bad
  • Heating issue
  • Sub-par battery life
  • Disappointing low-light camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus M680 with Lenovo K8 Note. When you see InFocus M680 Vs Lenovo K8 Note comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus M680 stands against Lenovo K8 Note and which one you should buy. The best price of InFocus M680 is currently Rs. 7,999. The lowest price for Lenovo K8 Note is Rs. 10,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 15, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page