Compare InFocus M680 vs Swipe Elite Sense

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on InFocus M680 is 9.0% more
  • Swipe Elite Sense's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Swipe Elite Sense's RAM is 33.0% more
 
InFocus M680
Swipe Elite Sense
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
97 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 308   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156 x 76.8 x 7.25 143.4 x 71.8 x 8.7   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Silver Champagne Gold, Space Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

InFocus M680 vs Swipe Elite Sense Specs

Specs
InFocus M680Swipe Elite Sense  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

InFocus M680 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device even if the design is not the most original
  • Solid construction and feels very secure
  • Useful tweaks in the UI
  • Daylight shots from the camera are good
  • Call quality is really impressive
The Bad
  • The paint on the gold colour unit chips off with regular usage
  • Accessories seem to be made out of really cheap materials
  • Display legibility in direct sunlight is poor
  • Capacitive touch buttons have poor accuracy
  • Push the phone too hard and you will find the phone can get a fair bit warm

Swipe Elite Sense Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good quality display
  • Decent camera and battery
  • Good at this price
The Bad
  • Somewhat poor gaming experience
  • Lacks a dedicated memory card slot
  • Gyro and Magnetic sensors are missing

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus M680 with Swipe Elite Sense. When you see InFocus M680 Vs Swipe Elite Sense comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus M680 stands against Swipe Elite Sense and which one you should buy. The best price of InFocus M680 is currently Rs. 8,879. The lowest price for Swipe Elite Sense is Rs. 7,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page