Compare Intex Aqua 5.5 VR vs Swipe Elite Sense

Feature Comparison

  • The Intex Aqua 5.5 VR has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 9.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Swipe Elite Sense's is 75.0% more than Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
  • Swipe Elite Sense has 3GB RAM and Intex Aqua 5.5 VR has 1GB RAM
 
Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
Swipe Elite Sense
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267.02 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Adreno 308   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Face Beauty, Panorama Mode, Gesture Capture, Anti Shake, Smile Shot Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
153.7 x 72.8 x 9.9 143.4 x 71.8 x 8.7   
Weight
176 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne, Blue Champagne Gold, Space Gray, Ivory White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR vs Swipe Elite Sense Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua 5.5 VRSwipe Elite Sense  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Impressive battery life
  • VoLTE & VR supported
  • Speaker output is decent
The Bad
  • Not that great a performer
  • Average cameras on either sides
  • Slow charging
  • Median VR experience

Swipe Elite Sense Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good quality display
  • Decent camera and battery
  • Good at this price
The Bad
  • Somewhat poor gaming experience
  • Lacks a dedicated memory card slot
  • Gyro and Magnetic sensors are missing

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua 5.5 VR with Swipe Elite Sense. When you see Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Vs Swipe Elite Sense comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua 5.5 VR stands against Swipe Elite Sense and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua 5.5 VR is currently Rs. 4,499. The lowest price for Swipe Elite Sense is Rs. 5,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page