Compare Intex Aqua 5.5 VR vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Aqua 5.5 VR has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Xolo Era 2X 3GB's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Xolo Era 2X 3GB's is 66.0% more than Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
 
Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
Xolo Era 2X 3GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
80 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267.02 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Face Beauty, Panorama Mode, Gesture Capture, Anti Shake, Smile Shot Auto Focus Rear Camera with 5P Largan Lens, F2.0, Blue Glass Filter, Face Beauty, HDR, Panorama, Gesture Recognition, Voice Capture, Smile Shot, Face Detection, Self Timer, Time Lapse Video   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
153.7 x 72.8 x 9.9 144 x x72.3 x 9.5   
Weight
176 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne, Blue Black and Gun, Latte Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua 5.5 VRXolo Era 2X 3GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Impressive battery life
  • VoLTE & VR supported
  • Speaker output is decent
The Bad
  • Not that great a performer
  • Average cameras on either sides
  • Slow charging
  • Median VR experience

Xolo Era 2X 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Useful fingerprint sensor embedded gestures
  • Decent overall performance
  • Reliance Jio (VoLTE) supported
The Bad
  • Big footprint despite a 5-inch display
  • Average display quality
  • Median camera output
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua 5.5 VR with Xolo Era 2X 3GB. When you see Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua 5.5 VR stands against Xolo Era 2X 3GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua 5.5 VR is currently Rs. 4,499. The lowest price for Xolo Era 2X 3GB is Rs. 6,234. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page