Compare Intex Aqua Ace 4G vs ZTE Blade A2 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • ZTE Blade A2 Plus has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • ZTE Blade A2 Plus's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • ZTE Blade A2 Plus has 4GB RAM, whereas Intex Aqua Ace 4G has 3GB RAM
 
Intex Aqua Ace 4G
ZTE Blade A2 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
76 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Add Face Detection, Gesture Capture, Take Photo While Recording, Voice Capture,Panorama, Mira Vision Touch Focus, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Self timer, ISO Setting, Scene mode, Exposure comepnsation, White balance settings, Face detection,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
145 x 71.5 x 6.7 155 x 76.2 x 9.8   
Weight
122 grams 189 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold, Gray   
Build Material
Glass, Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.01GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Intex Aqua Ace 4G vs ZTE Blade A2 Plus Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua Ace 4GZTE Blade A2 Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

ZTE Blade A2 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impeccable battery life
  • Useful features added to fingerprint sensor
  • Good overall performance
The Bad
  • Cluttered UI
  • Mediocre cameras
  • Build quality could have been better

Intex Aqua Ace 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for excellent multitasking experience
  • Support 4G LTE network in India
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Not that great processor performance
  • Android Lollipop is a slight disappointment in Marshmallow era

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Ace 4G with ZTE Blade A2 Plus. When you see Intex Aqua Ace 4G Vs ZTE Blade A2 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Ace 4G stands against ZTE Blade A2 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua Ace 4G is currently Rs. 9,393. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page