Compare Intex Aqua Style Pro vs Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450's got 6.0% more Screen Size
  • The Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Intex Aqua Style Pro's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • The 2GB RAM on the Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 is 50.0% more
 
Intex Aqua Style Pro
Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 4.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 306 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Broadcom Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Broadcom 23550 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Exmor-R CMOS Image Sensor, Exposure Compensation, Face Detection, Geo Tagging, ISO Control, Touch To Focus, White Balance Presets   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133 x 65 x 8.8 141.9 x 68.1 x 5.1   
Weight
120 grams 97 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black, White   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.07W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.31W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.3GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE 800 / 1800 / 2600 TD-LTE 2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1800mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Intex Aqua Style Pro vs Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua Style ProMicromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450  
Screen Size 4.5 inch4.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1800mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very slim at 5.1mm and light at just 97grams
  • Sharp display with Gorilla Glass 3 Protection
  • Stylish sleek design
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • Mediocre performance
  • Lacks SD card support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Style Pro with Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450. When you see Intex Aqua Style Pro Vs Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Style Pro stands against Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua Style Pro is currently Rs. 5,999. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 is Rs. 6,690. The prices for both these products were updated November 21, 2017.
Report an error on this page