Compare Karbonn Titanium MachFive vs Alcatel PIXI 4 (5)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Karbonn Titanium MachFive is the same as Alcatel PIXI 4 (5)
  • Karbonn Titanium MachFive's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Alcatel PIXI 4 (5)'s 8GB Internal Storage
  • Karbonn Titanium MachFive's 2GB RAM is more than Alcatel PIXI 4 (5)'s 1GB RAM
 
Karbonn Titanium MachFive
Alcatel PIXI 4 (5)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
57 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 233 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
14.3 x 0.9 x 7.3 140.7 x 72.5 x 9.5   
Weight
159 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Champagne, Silver Metal Gold, Sharp Blue, Metal Silver, Volcano Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.29GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2200mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Karbonn Titanium MachFive vs Alcatel PIXI 4 (5) Specs

Specs
Karbonn Titanium MachFiveAlcatel PIXI 4 (5)  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2200mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Alcatel PIXI 4 (5) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality and handy form factor
  • Supports 4G LTE with VoLTE (Reliance Jio network)
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot in addition to Dual SIM slots
  • Android 6.0 Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Just 8GB of onboard storage
  • 2000mAh battery is not that great
  • Below average overall perfromance
  • Fixed focus camera

Karbonn Titanium MachFive Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Small display with a good resolution
  • Front LED Flash along with a 5 megapixel camera
  • IR Blaster to control other gadgets like Television and Air Conditioner
  • Near Stock Android UI
The Bad
  • IR Blaster accuracy may be an issue
  • Below Average Battery Life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Karbonn Titanium MachFive with Alcatel PIXI 4 (5). When you see Karbonn Titanium MachFive Vs Alcatel PIXI 4 (5) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn Titanium MachFive stands against Alcatel PIXI 4 (5) and which one you should buy. The best price of Karbonn Titanium MachFive is currently Rs. 4,469. The lowest price for Alcatel PIXI 4 (5) is Rs. 4,299. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page