Compare Lava V5 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 7

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has 3.0% more Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 7's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy Note 7's is 25.0% more than Lava V5
 
Lava V5
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
58 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
89 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
267.02 PPI 515 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 5   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 Exynos 8890   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Mali-T880 MP12   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, panorama Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, Iris Scanner, Stylus, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
151.9 x 76.7 x 8.3 153.5 x 73.9 x 7.9   
Weight
153 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black Onyx, Silver Titanium, Blue Coral, Gold Platinum   
Build Material
Metal, Polycarbonate Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for Phone and 6 months warranty for in the box accessories -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.23GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No Yes   
Fast Charging
No Yes   

Lava V5 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Specs

Specs
Lava V5Samsung Galaxy Note 7  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP12MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Slightly less wider helps a lot in single handed usage
  • Premium build and great ergonomics
  • New S-Pen features are exceptionally convenient
  • Brilliant rear camera performance, good in low light conditions as well
  • Iris scanner does a pretty good job in any given condition
The Bad
  • Lacks an IR Blaster
  • Gorilla Glass 5 on either sides of the device is more prone to scratches than Gorilla Glass 4
  • Iris scanner is not the fastest way to unlock, fingerprint scanner works faster comparitively

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava V5 with Samsung Galaxy Note 7. When you see Lava V5 Vs Samsung Galaxy Note 7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava V5 stands against Samsung Galaxy Note 7 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava V5 is currently Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page