Compare Lava Z25 vs Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Both Lava Z25 and Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB have same Screen Size
  • Both Lava Z25 and Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB have same Internal Storage
  • The Lava Z25 has 4GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
Lava Z25
Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
75 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6750 Exynos 7870   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T860 MP2 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Camera Details
1/3" sensor size, 1.12 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Star OS 3.3 TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.5 x 76.4 x 8.5 151.5 x 74.9 x 8.1   
Weight
163 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Gray Gold, Black   
Build Material
Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3020mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Lava Z25 vs Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB Specs

Specs
Lava Z25Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3020mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Great battery life
  • Solid build quality and easy to hold
The Bad
  • A bit slippery back panel
  • Comes with a lot of bloatware
  • Lacks fast charging & 4K video recording
  • Sub-par camera performance in low-light conditions

Lava Z25 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fair day-to-day performance
  • Selfie camera is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • Software needs polishing
  • Lacks fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava Z25 with Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB. When you see Lava Z25 Vs Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava Z25 stands against Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava Z25 is currently Rs. 13,499. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page