Compare Lava Z25 vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB

Feature Comparison

  • Both Lava Z25 and Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB have same Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB has 64GB Internal Storage and Lava Z25 has 32GB Internal Storage
  • The 4GB RAM on the Lava Z25 is 25.0% more
 
Lava Z25
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
93 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6750 Exynos 7870   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T860 MP2 Mali-T830   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Camera Details
1/3" sensor size, 1.12 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Interval Shot, Night, Panorama, Pro, Selfie, Sports, Sound and Shot, Wide Selfie   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Star OS 3.3 TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.5 x 76.4 x 8.5 151.7 x 75 x 8   
Weight
163 grams 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Gray Black, Gold   
Build Material
Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3020mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Lava Z25 vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB Specs

Specs
Lava Z25Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3020mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

Lava Z25 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fair day-to-day performance
  • Selfie camera is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
  • Good battery life
The Bad
  • Software needs polishing
  • Lacks fast charging support

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with 440 PPI
  • Display doesn't attract fingerprints
  • Satisfactory camera performance, even in low-light conditions
The Bad
  • Lacks ambient light sensor, thus auto-brightness doesn't work
  • Slippery back panel
  • Misses out on slo-mo video recording

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava Z25 with Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB. When you see Lava Z25 Vs Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava Z25 stands against Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava Z25 is currently Rs. 14,891. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page