Compare Lenovo A2010 vs Intex Aqua Turbo 4G

Feature Comparison

  • The Intex Aqua Turbo 4G's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 10.0% more
  • Both Lenovo A2010 and Intex Aqua Turbo 4G have same Internal Storage
  • Both Lenovo A2010 and Intex Aqua Turbo 4G have same RAM
 
Lenovo A2010
Intex Aqua Turbo 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
98 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
75 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735M MediaTek MT6735M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
131.5 x 66.5 x 9.9 144.5 x 72.5 x 8.9   
Weight
137 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.446W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.353W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.02GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Lenovo A2010 vs Intex Aqua Turbo 4G Specs

Specs
Lenovo A2010Intex Aqua Turbo 4G  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Lenovo A2010 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 4G Compatible
The Bad
  • 2nd SIM is 2G Only
  • 8GB of internal storage may seem inadequate

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A2010 with Intex Aqua Turbo 4G. When you see Lenovo A2010 Vs Intex Aqua Turbo 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A2010 stands against Intex Aqua Turbo 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo A2010 is currently Rs. 6,000. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Turbo 4G is Rs. 6,998. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page