Compare Lenovo A2020 vs Intex Cloud String V2.0

Feature Comparison

  • Both Lenovo A2020 and Intex Cloud String V2.0 have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Lenovo A2020 is the same as Intex Cloud String V2.0
  • Intex Cloud String V2.0 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Lenovo A2020
Intex Cloud String V2.0
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
51 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 Spreadtrum SC9832A   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 304 Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Auto Flash, CMOS Image Sensor, Self-Timer, Touch to Focus, Scene Mode, ISO Setting Geo tagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face detection, White Balance setting, ISO Setting, Exposure Compensation, Self timer, Scene Mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
136.1 x 67.8 x 9.9 72.5 x 144.5 x 8.7   
Weight
128 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Champagne, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.28GB 10GB   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo A2020 vs Intex Cloud String V2.0 Specs

Specs
Lenovo A2020Intex Cloud String V2.0  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Intex Cloud String V2.0 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The 2.5D glass on the front makes for good swiping from the edges enhancing the experience
  • Fingerprint scanner included at the back is actually decent for the price
  • Despite being rear mounted, the speaker is really loud
  • The display is vibrant and makes for a good reading
  • Size of the phone is good for a one handed usage
The Bad
  • The phone has QC issues, the removable back leaves hairline gap when it is closed
  • The mirror-ed fingerprint scanner on the back picks up a lot of fingerprint smudges and looks untidy
  • The phone throws ads that you cannot stop on the lockscreen
  • Even in broad daylight, the camera is slow and sluggish and really struggles to take pictures
  • Software is not the most polished

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A2020 with Intex Cloud String V2.0. When you see Lenovo A2020 Vs Intex Cloud String V2.0 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A2020 stands against Intex Cloud String V2.0 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated June 26, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page