Compare Lenovo A6000 Plus vs Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo A6000 Plus is the same as Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
  • Internal Storage of Lenovo A6000 Plus is the same as Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
  • RAM of Lenovo A6000 Plus is the same as Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
 
Lenovo A6000 Plus
Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
79 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 70 x 8.2 141.5 x 70.7 x 11   
Weight
128 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Red, White Black, White   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2470mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo A6000 Plus vs Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Specs

Specs
Lenovo A6000 PlusMotorola Moto G 3rd Gen  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2470mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good HD display and Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Near Stock UI experience and faster Android updates
  • Water Resistant IP67 rating
  • 4G and VoLTE Support
  • Improved 13MP camera
The Bad
  • Average battery capacity at 2470mAh
  • No Full HD display
  • No notification LED
  • No USB cable supplied with the device

Lenovo A6000 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decently sharp HD display with 294PPI
  • Support 4G LTE
  • Decent performance considering the chip and 2GB RAM
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version (Android 4.4 KitKat)
  • Average battery life
  • Records video up to 720p (HD) only
  • Not the best of processor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A6000 Plus with Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen. When you see Lenovo A6000 Plus Vs Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A6000 Plus stands against Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G 3rd Gen is Rs. 10,990. The prices for both these products were updated August 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page