Compare Lenovo A7000 vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime

Feature Comparison

  • The Lenovo A7000's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's Screen Size is 5 inch
  • The Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's got 32GB Internal Storage, while Lenovo A7000's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's 3GB RAM is more than Lenovo A7000's 2GB RAM
 
Lenovo A7000
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
64 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6752M Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-760 MP2 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
152.6 x 76.2 x 7.99 139.30 x 69.60 x 8.50   
Weight
140 grams 144 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Yellow, Black, Pearl White Gold, Silver, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 25.75GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2900mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo A7000 vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime Specs

Specs
Lenovo A7000Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2900mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo A7000 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good 2900mAh battery
  • 4G LTE support
  • Smooth performance with 2GB RAM
The Bad
  • Average camera
  • Not that crisp display with just 267PPI
  • Mediocre processor

Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very impressive battery life
  • Handy form factor and good build quality
  • Rear and front cameras take good pictures compared to others
  • Snappy performance, thanks to the 3GB RAM and Marshmallow based MIUI
  • Features like fingerprint scanner and IR blaster are huge plus
The Bad
  • Usability of either Dual SIMs or a Single SIM with a MicroSD card (Hybrid slot) can disappoint some

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A7000 with Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime. When you see Lenovo A7000 Vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A7000 stands against Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo A7000 is currently Rs. 8,800. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page