Compare Lenovo K6 Note vs InFocus EPIC 1

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo K6 Note is the same as InFocus EPIC 1
  • Internal Storage of Lenovo K6 Note is the same as InFocus EPIC 1
  • Both Lenovo K6 Note and InFocus EPIC 1 have same RAM
 
Lenovo K6 Note
InFocus EPIC 1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
97 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
87 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MediaTek MT6797 Helio x20   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Deca-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 505 Mali-T880 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Phase Detection Autofocus, Dual-LED (Dual Tone) Flash Features Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Exposure compensation, ISO control, Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
151 x 76 x 8.4 153 x 76 x 8.4   
Weight
169 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Dark Gray, Gold, Silver Rose Gold   
Build Material
Metal Unibody -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo K6 Note vs InFocus EPIC 1 Specs

Specs
Lenovo K6 NoteInFocus EPIC 1  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP16MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  

Lenovo K6 Note Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Proficient battery life
  • Striking display quality
  • Supports Ant VR
  • Rear camera performs well
The Bad
  • Non-competent performance
  • Lacks strengthened glass protection

InFocus EPIC 1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp Full HD display with Gorilla Glass proection
  • Good performance, thanks to the powerful processor and 3GB RAM
  • Support Reliance Jio network (VoLTE)
  • Rear camera takes decent shots
  • Battery life holds up well and also supports fast charging
The Bad
  • Not the fastest fingerprint sensor
  • Does not ship with the latest Android Nougat
  • Unpolished user interface

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo K6 Note with InFocus EPIC 1. When you see Lenovo K6 Note Vs InFocus EPIC 1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo K6 Note stands against InFocus EPIC 1 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo K6 Note is currently Rs. 9,949. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page