Compare Lenovo Phab 2 Plus vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The Lenovo Phab 2 Plus's got 6.4 inch Screen Size, while HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)'s Screen Size is 5.2 inch
  • Lenovo Phab 2 Plus has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Lenovo Phab 2 Plus has 33.0% more RAM
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
90 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.4 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
344.2 PPI 569 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT8783 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 2MP   
Camera Details
+13MP Rear Camera, Digital zoom, Touch focus, HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Continuous shooting, Exposure compensation, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Self-timer, Scene mode Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
174 x 88 x 5.5 150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61   
Weight
218 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray Silver, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 2840mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) Specs

Specs
Lenovo Phab 2 PlusHTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)  
Screen Size 6.4 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh2840mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP2MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Audio output is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
The Bad
  • Under whelming overall performance
  • Massive size makes it difficult to hold
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average battery life
  • Schemed dual rear cameras

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Phab 2 Plus with HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB). When you see Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Phab 2 Plus stands against HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Phab 2 Plus is currently Rs. 13,999. The lowest price for HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) is Rs. 16,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page