Compare Lenovo Phab 2 Plus vs Smartron srt.phone

Feature Comparison

  • The Lenovo Phab 2 Plus's Screen Size measures in at 6.4 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 14.0% more
  • Both Lenovo Phab 2 Plus and Smartron srt.phone have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Smartron srt.phone's is 25.0% more than Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
Smartron srt.phone
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
94 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
344.2 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT8783 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
+13MP Rear Camera, Digital zoom, Touch focus, HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Continuous shooting, Exposure compensation, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Self-timer, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF)   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
174 x 88 x 5.5 153 x 77 x 8.9   
Weight
218 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray Titanium Gray   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0   

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus vs Smartron srt.phone Specs

Specs
Lenovo Phab 2 PlusSmartron srt.phone  
Screen Size 6.4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Audio output is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
The Bad
  • Under whelming overall performance
  • Massive size makes it difficult to hold
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average battery life
  • Schemed dual rear cameras

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Phab 2 Plus with Smartron srt.phone. When you see Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Vs Smartron srt.phone comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Phab 2 Plus stands against Smartron srt.phone and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Phab 2 Plus is currently Rs. 13,999. The lowest price for Smartron srt.phone is Rs. 9,295. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page