Compare Lenovo Phab 2 Plus vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Mi Max 2's 6.44 inch Screen Size is more than Lenovo Phab 2 Plus's 6.4 inch Screen Size
  • Both Lenovo Phab 2 Plus and Xiaomi Mi Max 2 have same Internal Storage
  • Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has 4GB RAM, whereas Lenovo Phab 2 Plus has 3GB RAM
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
We Love
Xiaomi Mi Max 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
89 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.4 inch 6.44 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
344.2 PPI 342 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT8783 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
+13MP Rear Camera, Digital zoom, Touch focus, HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Continuous shooting, Exposure compensation, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Self-timer, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
- MiUi 8   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
174 x 88 x 5.5 174.1 × 88.7 × 7.6   
Weight
218 grams 211 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray Silver, Black   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 5300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Quick charge 3.0, Parallel charging   

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2 Specs

Specs
Lenovo Phab 2 PlusXiaomi Mi Max 2  
Screen Size 6.4 inch6.44 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP12MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh5300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Audio output is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
The Bad
  • Under whelming overall performance
  • Massive size makes it difficult to hold
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average battery life
  • Schemed dual rear cameras

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Phab 2 Plus with Xiaomi Mi Max 2. When you see Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Phab 2 Plus stands against Xiaomi Mi Max 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo Phab 2 Plus is currently Rs. 13,999. The lowest price for Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is Rs. 12,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page