Compare Lenovo Phab vs Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Phab's Screen Size is 25.0% more
  • Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL has 32GB Internal Storage and Lenovo Phab has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL has 3GB RAM, whereas Lenovo Phab has 2GB RAM
 
Lenovo Phab
We Love
Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
67 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
69 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.98 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
210.4 PPI 282.42 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Backlight (Super HDR), Low Light, Selfie, Panorama, Beautification, Time Lapse, Effect modes   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Vibe UI Zen UI 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
186 x 97 x 8.9 149.5 x 73.7 x 8.55   
Weight
250 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Tuxedo Black Titanium Gray, Sand Gold, Glacier Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on Handset & 6 Months on Accessories.   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
23.91GB 22.51GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes, Google Drive 100GB free space (2 years)   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4250mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lenovo Phab vs Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL Specs

Specs
Lenovo PhabAsus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL  
Screen Size 6.98 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4250mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge display gives a great multimedia experience
  • Great battery life with 4250mAh unit
  • 4G LTE enabled
  • Expandable storage up to 64GB
The Bad
  • Below average display quality with just 210PPI
  • Mediocre performance with a chipset for budget devices
  • Not that great camera output
  • Huge size for comfortable usage as a mobile device

Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent battery life
  • Good speaker output
  • Vivid display
  • Sturdy build quality
The Bad
  • Fingerprint sensor can be hit or miss at times
  • Average display sharpness
  • Lacks a dedicated storage expansion slot

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Phab with Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL. When you see Lenovo Phab Vs Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Phab stands against Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL is Rs. 9,850. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page